Pre-litigation and litigation Law firm
References
« The exhausting struggle of the family of Carbon against a giant of the automobile »
Le Monde 17th March 2000
A successful case thanks to the partnership of Jérôme Gagey and Jean-Christophe Bernicat from 1995 to 2001
« Orange condemns 7 million euros in damages, three firms on the deal»
Business Lawyers Letter 15th May 2017
“LITIGATION AND CONFLICT: LEGAL-CLINICAL APPROACH IN FAMILY LAW”
DALLOZ review : “Family Legal News” – November 2020
Page 1 out of 7
- Legal-clinical approach
- Specificity: priority to the facts and the conflictual dimension
- The long duration of the legal-clinical interviewing
- Compatibility of the legal-clinical approach and legal reasoning
- No hasty recourse to the legal tool
- Problem of the legal-clinical approach
- Countertransference reactions
- An ajusted complicity/distancing at the service of the client / litigant
“WHAT PLACE FOR CONFLICTALITY IN FAMILY LITIGATION? :
BETWEEN LEGITIMATE REJECTION AND NECESSARY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT”.
DALLOZ review : “Family Legal News” – July-August 2021:
Page 1 out of 10
A – Rejection of conflictuality in family law
1 – Rejection by the legislator of the historical-conflictual dimension of disputes
- The argument based on the necessary serenity of the debates
- “Return of the repressed”
- Divorce time: the false argument of the deferred treatment of conflictuality
2 – Promotion of the child’s best interest
- The child’s best interest : a ” legal-clinical” management tool
- On the merits, the concept of child’s best interest is not very effective
- Conclusion
B – Salvation of family justice: Rehabilitation of the historical-conflictual context
- The necessary admissibility of concise and detailed accounts of the couple’s life
- The legal-clinical approach is not moral
- Necessary rehabilitation of the disputed history